In environmental assessments, extension of existing utilities is preferred because it:

The preference for extending existing utilities in environmental assessments fundamentally stems from its potential to reduce both costs and environmental impact. When existing utility infrastructure—such as water, sewer, and electricity—is extended rather than building new systems from scratch, the financial burden on local governments and developers diminishes significantly. This approach often leads to decreased construction expenses and durations since established routes are utilized, and existing infrastructure can be expanded rather than completely developed anew.

Moreover, when extending utilities, there is typically less environmental disruption compared to establishing new lines in untouched areas. This helps mitigate habitat destruction, reduce soil disturbance, and limit other negative impacts on local ecosystems. By harnessing the existing network, the overall environmental footprint of development projects is minimized, aligning with sustainable development principles.

While the other choices—elimination of permits, assurance of maximum land development potential, and reduced regulatory oversight—might seem advantageous, they do not encapsulate the principal reasons behind the preference for extending existing utilities. Regulatory frameworks still require adherence, and land development potential is not guaranteed by merely extending utilities. Therefore, the key benefit lies in the dual aspects of cost savings and reduced environmental consequences associated with such extensions.